Grace covers me anyway, so what’s the point?” is the sharpest question people ask about the book. This post answers it by showing that grace has two meanings, forgiveness and enabling power, then gives six reasons 1 John 3:9 still matters, using Scripture, Wesley, and the evidence around us.
Read this post →A viral video from Christian Faith Archive says many American megachurches have quietly dropped two doctrines: the reality of hell and the sinfulness of sin. This post checks that claim against Jesus’ words, John Wesley, and Lifeway Research’s 2025 survey data. It ties the result to the book’s Trap Two and to 1 John 3:9.
Read this post →John Wesley refused the phrase "sinless perfection" by name in 1759. The line he drew between willful sin and honest mistakes, and what the book's title actually claims.
Read this post →No, the book doesn't claim literal, never-a-mistake sinlessness — it's specifically about willful sin. As for the Greek behind 1 John 3:9: does "does not sin" describe a habit, or a nature? Only one of those actually fits what John wrote — and it's not the one most translations assume.
Read this post →Paul called himself a doulos of Christ: a slave who owned nothing and could not quit. English Bibles say "servant," a word with off-hours, and that changes how 1 John 3:9 reads.
Read this post →A widely held position says salvation, once given, cannot be lost: it is grace, period. The cross really was sufficient. That still answers a different question than the one actually on the table.
Read this post →Join the list and each new post arrives as it publishes.
Join the List
